Assignment 4: Project Progress

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 200 Assignment 4: Project Progress
Criteria Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Analyze the impact of those events on the project.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the impact of those events on the project. Partially analyzed the impact of those events on the project. Satisfactorily analyzed the impact of those events on the project. Thoroughly analyzed the impact of those events on the project.
2. Determine if any mitigation activities are required and explain why. Weight: 25% Did not submit or incompletely determined if any mitigation activities are required; did not submit or incompletely explained why. Partially determined if any mitigation activities are required; partially explained why. Satisfactorily determined if any mitigation activities are required; satisfactorily explained why. Thoroughly determined if any mitigation activities are required; thoroughly explained why.
3. Determine if budget / schedule changes are necessary and explain why.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely determined if budget / schedule changes are necessary; did not submit or incompletely explained why. Partially determined if budget / schedule changes are necessary; partially explained why. Satisfactorily determined if budget / schedule changes are necessary; satisfactorily explained why. Thoroughly determined if budget / schedule changes are necessary; thoroughly explained why.
4. Update the risk register and highlight the changes made. Provide the justification for the changes.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely updated the risk register; did not submit or incompletely provided the changes made along with the justification for the changes. Partially updated the risk register; partially provided the changes made along with the justification for the changes. Satisfactorily updated the risk register; satisfactorily provided the changes made along with the justification for the changes. Thoroughly updated the risk register; thoroughly provided the changes made along with the justification for the changes.
5. 4 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present