Case Study Part 3 Grading Rubric

Case Study Part 3 Grading Rubric

Criteria Levels of Achievement
Content 70% Advanced Proficient Developing Not present
97 to 105 points*

Created an accurate pre-event day menu and an accurate menu for the day of competition along with dietary analysis and hydration guide.

Menu & discussion takes into account micro and macro- nutrient recommendations: Calories, Grams of Carbohydrate, Grams of Protein, Grams or % Fat, Timing, Fluid needs

Nutrient adequacy and how to improve nutrient needs is excellently addressed.

Provided complete and accurate charts that were easy to follow AND coincided with report.

Submission addressed all necessary features from parts 1 and 2. Provided specific nutrition information and recommendations to help prevent, reduce, or alleviate issues and challenges presented in Part 2. Student demonstrated excellence based on their suggestions and rationale of each area identified

88 to 96 points*

Created an acceptable pre-event day menu and a menu for the day of competition along with dietary analysis and hydration guide.

Menu & discussion adequately takes into account micro and macro- nutrient recommendations: Calories, Grams of Carbohydrate, Grams of Protein, Grams or % Fat, Timing, Fluid needs

Nutrient adequacy and how to improve nutrient needs is adequately addressed.

Provided adequate charts one could follow AND they coincided with report.

Submission addressed nearly all necessary features from parts 1 and 2. Provided specific nutrition information and recommendations to help prevent, reduce, or alleviate issues and challenges presented in Part 2. Student demonstrated acceptable competence based on their suggestions and rationale of each area identified

1 to 87 points*

An attempt was made to create pre-event day menu and a menu for the day of competition along with dietary analysis and hydration guide.

Menu & discussion partially takes into account micro and macro- nutrient recommendations: Calories, Grams of Carbohydrate, Grams of Protein, Grams or % Fat, Timing, Fluid needs

Explanation of nutrient adequacy and how to improve nutrient needs was attempted.

Provided incomplete or inaccurate charts that were confusing or unclear. They may or may not have coincided with report.

Submission did not adequately address necessary features from parts 1 and 2. Or did not provided specific nutrition information and recommendations to help prevent, reduce, or alleviate issues and challenges presented in Part 2. Student demonstrated partial competence based on their suggestions and rationale of each area identified

0 points
Structure 30% Advanced Proficient Developing Not present
41 to 45 points*

Proper AMA formatting. Minimum of 2 peer-reviewed resources are cited. Excellent Spelling & grammar, and proper word count

38 to 40 points*

1-2 Errors in AMA formatting.

1-2 peer-reviewed resources

Minor Spelling & grammar errors (<3-4)

proper word count

to 37 points*

3 or more Errors in AMA formatting.

0-1 peer-reviewed resources

Significant Spelling & grammar errors (>4)

Word count is either significantly over or under proper amount.

0 points