Grading Rubric for HOSP304 Nutritional Tools Reflection Activity

Grading Rubric for HOSP304 Nutritional Tools Reflection Activity

Criteria Exemplary Accomplished Developing Beginning
Points 31-40 19-30 11-20 0-10
Content

XX/40

Reflection paper shows a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of the student’s experience using the tracker tools along with a complete analysis of the usefulness of such tools as queried in the assignment description. Original thought is evident in the description of adjectives. Reader gains important insights. Reflection paper shows a thoughtful, analysis of the student’s experience using the tracker tools along with an analysis of the usefulness of such tools. Original thought is evident in the description of adjectives. Reader gains some insights. Reflection paper does not show considerable reflection on the experience or does not share opinions on the usefulness of the tools. Completion is basic or general. Little critical analysis or original thought is evident in self-recommendations. Content basically summarizes other sources without introducing new insights. Reader gains few insights. Analysis is vague or not evident in reflection and recommendations. Writing has serious flaws in logic and omissions in evidence. Reader is confused or may be misinformed.
Points 16 – 20 11 – 15 6 – 10 0-5
Forms and Recommendations

XX/20

The Student’s central purpose or argument is readily apparent to the reader. The completion of the forms and self-recommendations clearly goes beyond minimum requirements. The Student has a clear purpose or argument, but may sometimes digress from it. The forms and reflection are complete and meet expectations. The central purpose or argument is not consistently clear throughout the paper. The forms and reflection fail to meet the minimum requirements. The purpose or argument is generally unclear. The writing does not address the assignment.
Organization and Completion

XX/20

Three daily USDA log reports and a reflection paper are completed included in the submission Two daily USDA log reports and a reflection paper are completed and included in the submission One USDA daily log and the reflection paper are completed are included in the submission Either three USDA Logs OR the reflection paper is not submitted
Points 7.6-10 6-7.5 2.6-5 0-2.5
Tone XX/10 The tone is consistently professional and appropriate for a college submission. The tone is generally professional. The tone is not consistently professional The tone is unprofessional.
Grammar, Spelling, Writing Mechanics

XX/10

The writing is free or almost free of errors. There are occasional errors, but they don’t represent a major distraction or obscure meaning. The writing has many errors, and the reader is distracted by them. There are so many errors that meaning is obscured. The reader is confused and stops reading.