Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 215 ( 2015 ) 2 – 8

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

1877-0428 © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of IECC 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.565

ScienceDirect

International Conference for International Education and Cross-cultural Communication. Problems and Solutions (IECC-2015), 09-11 June 2015, Tomsk Polytechnic University,

Tomsk, Russia

British Universities: International Students’ Alleged Lack of Critical Thinking

Elena V. Fella, Natalia A. Lukianovaa,b*

aTomsk Polytechnic University, 30, Lenin Ave., Tomsk, 634050, Russia bTomsk State University, 36, Lenin Ave., Tomsk, 634050, Russia

Abstract

This paper investigates British academics’ perception of international students’ alleged lack of critical thinking and poor writing performance. This research is relevant to those students and academics expected to demonstrate competences required for acceptance in the English speaking academic environment. The aim of this paper is to investigate in detail those factors that make British academics devalue academic material written in English as a second language. Using literature review and literature analysis as research methods, the authors present a detailed summary of problems associated with international students’ performance in the UK universities and conclude with a set of practical recommendations for Russian speaking students and academics. © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Peer-review under responsibility of Tomsk Polytechnic University.

Keywords: Critical thinking; lateral thinking; academic writing; British universities; psychometric tests; international students.

1. Introduction

Problems associated with international students’ performance in the UK universities are primarily linked to their apparent lack of critical thinking skills. According to Elder, “Critical thinking is self-guided, self-disciplined thinking which attempts to reason at the highest level of quality in a fair-minded way” (Elder, 2002). People who think critically, she asserts, strive to act rationally, empathically and reasonably. They are aware of the imperfections of human reasoning and do their best to stop their own egocentric and sociocentric tendencies from affecting their

* Corresponding author. Tel: +79059912495

E-mail address: lukianova@tpu.ru

© 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of IECC 2015.

3 Elena V. Fell and Natalia A. Lukianova / Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 215 ( 2015 ) 2 – 8

judgments. They access, analyze, and improve their own thinking. They strive to achieve intellectual integrity, humility, civility, empathy, and sense of justice in reason. They accept their own intellectual limitations and understand that their own reasoning can still be impaired by prejudices, irrationality, biases and misrepresentations as well as by uncritically accepting social rules and social taboos, vested interest and self-interest. Their goal is to improve the world and work towards a more rational and civilized society. Nevertheless, critical thinkers recognize the difficulties involved in perusing intellectual perfection. They do not think simplistically about complicated matters and do their best to consider other people’s needs and rights. They “recognize the complexities in developing as thinkers, and commit themselves to life-long practice toward self-improvement. They embody the Socratic principle: The unexamined life is not worth living, because they realize that many unexamined lives together result in an uncritical, unjust, dangerous world” (Сritical thinking community). There is a variety of approaches that define critical thinking by highlighting different aspects, with Dewey (1933) focusing on the capacity to weigh evidence and analyze ideas, (Glaser, 1941; Dewey, 1933) relating critical thinking to logical inquiry, whilst Scheffler (1973) and Glaser (1941) define critical thinking as the ability to evaluate. For Seigel (1990) (Scheffler, 1973), critical thinking is a process of goal-directed thinking to improve thoughts and actions and Lipman (1995) (Siegel, 1990) asserts that critical thinking is a way of developing the skill of sound judgment which is required for self-correctness. Shaheen (Shaheen, 2012) presents Mayfield’s position on critical thinking as the ability to “recognize assumptions; separate facts from opinions and make evaluations; ask questions and question the validity of evidence; verify information and listen to observe; seek to understand several perspectives, and seek the truth before reporting it” (Shaheen & Nisbah, 2012; Halpern, 1998).

2. Critical thinking in British education

Overcoming the disparity of approaches to defining critical thinking, Facione’s Critical Thinking: a Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction states the following:“We understand critical thinking to be purposeful, self-regulatory judgment which results in interpretation, analysis, evaluation, and inference, as well as explanation of the evidential, conceptual, methodological, contextual considerations upon which that judgment is based (Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction, 1990). Critical thinking is taught in British schools as a skills-based rather than content- based subject. Seventeen and eighteen year-olds who choose this subject as an option for their A Levels, develop their ability to interpret, analyse and evaluate ideas and arguments (Elder, 2009).

In Higher Education, critical thinking is an essential component of students’ set of competences necessary for successful completion of any degree program as “[c]ritical thinking forms the heart and soul of every subject because its concepts and principles are presupposed in, and give rise to, the logic of every subject”(Swatridge, 2014).

University students use books like The Oxford Guide to Effective Argument and Critical Thinking (Swatridge, 2014) in order to make sure that they know how to approach an essay or discussion question correctly, to review what claims others have made and offer counter-claims, to weigh up the strengths and weaknesses of their own argument before putting together a persuasive conclusion.

3. International students allegedly lack critical thinking

British educators claim that international students who come to study in the UK lack critical thinking and hence underperform when it comes to producing essays, dissertations and theses. Teaching professionals note international students’ lack of “higher order thinking skills”, differentiating critical thinking from the lower-level intellectual abilities of understanding, remembering and applying (Halpern, 1998; Lipman, 1995; Tsui, 2006; Halpern, 1998). Universities in the UK host substantial numbers of international students. The Office for National Statistics estimates that in the year ending September 2014 there were 133,000 non-EU long-term study immigrants (Tsui,

4 Elena V. Fell and Natalia A. Lukianova / Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 215 ( 2015 ) 2 – 8

2006), and questions about the extent of their adaptation to the British academic environment loom large. In particular, teaching professionals raise concerns about international students’ lack of critical thinking in academic writing. ” (Shaheen, 2012) notes that international students’ approaches towards critical thinking are often derived from their own cultures where a collective style of learning prevails over an individual one, and where people respect the work of other scholars and avoid criticizing it. Shaheen finds that students’ various conceptions of critical thinking which differ from that in British culture are the result of the cultural specificity of their socialization and the previous absence of relevant practice. She notes that the majority of international students choose surface learning strategies rather than deep learning strategies as specified by Jackie Lublin (Centre for Teaching and Learning, 2003). Shaheen’s study reveals that students from non-British traditions approach critical thinking tasks of formulating arguments and evaluating them, making sound judgments and analysing critically, in a different way then their British educators expect. Shaheen identified certain features of their home educational background as barriers in their development of critical thinking whist in the UK. In particular, students who produce poor results were not previously encouraged to think creatively and analytically. Cross-cultural issues provide explanations for specific problems related to international students’ poor performance in British universities, as critical thinking skills play an important role as assessment tools used in Britain.

International students consistently fail to answer analytically because they do not understand what it is to make their own point and are incapable of creating new meanings analytically. International students always receive much lower ratings, not only because they write in a foreign language, but also because they cannot think critically, presumably because they have not been trained to do so before they came to the UK (Davies, 2003).

Whilst marking non-British students’ writing, teaching professionals note that their texts are “lacking arguments”, have a “lack of clarity and criticality” and are “descriptive in nature” (Egege & Koteleh, 2004).

These comments relate to logic rather than language as in some cases students show a good level of English proficiency whilst presenting a poor argument in their paper (Egege & Kutieleh, 2004).

In addition to alleged cognitive deficiency, international students in British universities are renowned for dishonest behaviour such as plagiarism, improper textual borrowings, insufficient citation, excessive repetition and fraud (Howard, 2000).

4. Specific problems associated with international students’ writing

Shaheen (2012) identified specific issues associated with international students’ approach to writing which lead to poor writing performance as (1) passive learning experiences, (2) reproduction of ideas, (3) focus on the collection of information, (4) textbook-boundedness, (5) lack of purpose, (6) routine memorisation.

She has also listed critical thinking-related academic writing problems as (1) lack of clarity, (2) lack of critical analysis, (3) lack of critical evaluation, (4) lack of supporting evidence, (5) lack of precision and drawing conclusions.

Factors inhibiting international students’ critical thinking performance include, as Shaheen found: (1) parents’ educational background, (2) respect of elders, (3) fear of children’s independency, (4) authoritative learning environment in previous life, (5) weak English language foundations, (6) fear of confrontation, (7) passive learning environment in childhood, (8) lack of critical thinking awareness, (9) lack of valuing critical thinking, (10) lack of understanding of the concept of critical thinking, (11) differences of academic requirements between native and non- native context, (12) insufficient English language abilities.

Shaheen (2012) lists factors that affect the promotion of critical thinking and relate to students’ previous learning history. These are: (1) lack of critical thinking encouragement, (2) lack of the modelling of critical thinking, (3) poor methods of teaching writing, (4) unqualified teachers in English as a second language, (5) poor English language curriculum, (5) lack of questioning habits, (6) lack of debates and discussions.

5 Elena V. Fell and Natalia A. Lukianova / Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 215 ( 2015 ) 2 – 8

5. Cultural background as a barrier to developing critical thinking

Shaheen (2012) draws on Hofstede’s research that qualifies culture based learning approaches in terms of “power distance” (Hofstede, 1997). Hofstede defines power distance in terms of inequality in power, whereby less powerful people accept the authority of a powerful person as normal. According to Hofstede, the characteristics of the British culture include high individuality, low power distance and low uncertainty avoidance (Hofstede, 2014) whilst, for example, East Asian societies are characterized by low individualism, large power distance, and high uncertainty avoidance (Durkin, 2008).

The large power distance manifests itself in educational settings creating a passive learning environment, with students accepting and respecting the teacher’s authority. In such settings learning is based on teacher-centred events – lectures or lessons – in which the teacher’s expertise is respected and never criticised and where students do not normally speak without being invited to do so. On the contrary, in a culture with low power distance, students can speak spontaneously, question and contradict the teacher – they are expected to be independent (Hofstede, 1986). According to Meyers (Meyers, 1986), education traditions based on lectures foster passive learning, whereby critical thinking is hardly taught at all (Meyers, 1986). Overall researchers criticise students’ taking notes during lecturers being passive listeners (Richmonds, 2007), memory-based learning (Hofstede, 1986) and emphasis on students passing exams rather than on them developing a critical and analytical approach to learning (Volet and Renshaw, 1996; Meyers, 1986).

In the context of British education, international students’ classroom behaviour conditioned by their cultural background (avoidance of answering questions, not participating in group discussions, not having their own opinions and not challenging ideas) is taken negatively by their educators.

6. Russian students writing in English

None of the standards that regulate educational processes in Russia includes any mention of academic writing skills or courses in any language (Richmonds, 2007). Researchers identify the following problems resulting from this, and although these problems are noted in relation to legal profession, the same could be applied to other fields of research as well.

Most Russian legal writers (including prominent ones) need knowledge of clarity in academic writing and a system for presenting arguments, according to our Russian co-author who deals with Russian and English language submissions for a Russian law journal. The general problem is that legal writers in Russia tend to use (and reuse) language that is often dense and incomprehensible, with long sentences overloaded with subordinate clauses and stylistic errors. Russian law school postgraduates, moreover, have repeatedly complained about the lack of training in writing course papers and articles in Russian, while Russian law school professors complain about students poor writing qualities in terms of structure and argumentation. This dilemma may be supported by Russian law school administrators who leave no room in the curricula for legal writing, the emphasis being on substantive law rather than on legal learner skills for analyzing and communicating about the law. As in the U.S., quality is not a professorial or administrative issue but the personal responsibility of students assumed to “know how to write” before they get into law school (Somwung & Siridej, 2000).

This problem intensifies in the international education setting where Russian students, instead of a high-level, systematic academic instruction to produce quality research papers, dissertations and theses in their discipline, require support with basic skills and competences such as help with English grammar (Somwung & Siridej, 2000). The researchers continue: “[T]he lack of strong writing skills is especially obvious in such areas as writing dissertations and articles for professional journals. In 2013, Igor Fedyukin, a former Deputy Minister of Education and Science of the Russian Federation and a holder of a Ph.D. from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, complained about the low quality of academic articles and dissertations in terms of the language usage and structure.

6 Elena V. Fell and Natalia A. Lukianova / Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 215 ( 2015 ) 2 – 8

He also pointed out that “specialized academic writing centers” should be established at higher educational institutions in order to teach “academic writing in the internationally recognized format” (Interview of Igor Fedyukin, Deputy Minister of Education and Science of the RF, 2013).

Unfortunately, Fedyukin has since resigned, so there may be less support in the Russian Ministry of Education at this time to the idea of introducing academic writing courses (Somwung & Siridej, 2000).

7. Concluding statement and practical advice for international students

The above discussion, where English-speaking academics criticise international students’ critical thinking and academic writing skills, seems to contain an implicit claim that international students are inferior to their British counterparts, since critical thinking and academic writing skills are the main indicators of an academic’s intellectual worth. One may contest this conclusion. Indeed, historically, English speaking environment has not been the sole source of academic excellence in the world, and the wisdom that human race has accumulated over thousands of years was formed in different cultures who fostered different reasoning styles. Those people who acquire knowledge and process information in a different way than British academics should not be devalued just because their academic behaviours differ from a particular style accepted in the English speaking academic world. The British academics’ attitudes towards alternative styles of academic work can be compared with Berlioz’s dismissal of oriental music in his Letters as “a grotesque noise, analogous to that which children make when at play” (Partch, 1974). Indeed, the 19th century composer lacking specific training could not relate to the non-European, nuanced music due to the variations in intervals.

However, there is a practical need to adapt to the particular ways in which English-speaking academics operate. The skills and competences that are required in academia are educable and there is no reason why an intelligent student from any cultural background would not be able to acquire them. Acquiring new skills and adopting new behavioural patterns enriches one’s life and complicates one’s identity “combining various self-images” (Lukianova & Fell, 2015). It is worth taking into account that research indicates that in the U.S., Germany (and certainly in the UK – (Lukianova & Fell) “[W]omen are increasingly being ascribed more masculine features, such as competence and dominance.” (Interview of Igor Fedyukin, 2013). Thus in a British academic environment modest and reserved behaviour of a female student would not go in her favour.

It is important to acknowledge that new skills cannot be learnt instantly, or quickly. Bergson, analysing the nature of time, states that “[r]eal processes take some real, concrete time to happen, and these periods of time can only be regarded as absolute because they cannot be contracted or stretched” (Fell, 2012).

Mastery of critical thinking and academic writing skills by British students occurs over many years, as their training begins in early childhood. It is not realistic to expect that the same proficiency can be achieved in some short period of time.

The acquisition of the required skills is achievable but may take a number of years, assuming one is already fluent in English. However, steps can be taken to accelerate this process. Below are recommendations that could help.

Reading academic literature in one’s own area of expertise is essential. By doing this, you will familiarise yourself with the specific terminology that your English speaking colleagues use. Their papers will demonstrate ways in which it is customary to access and discuss your subject.

In order to grasp the framework within which British professionals operate, it is advisable to practice psychometric tests that can be accessed here: http://www.practiceaptitudetests.com/verbal-reasoning-tests/.

Nowadays taking psychometric tests is an essential procedure for British graduates as these measure their ability to reason adequately in a working environment. First, you can attempt to pass a verbal reasoning test, which will assess your understanding and comprehension skills. When you start you will be presented with a short passage of text and will need to select a True, False or Cannot Say response to each statement. Then you can try a Numerical Reasoning test and a Diagrammatic Reasoning test. If you pass these tests then you can be satisfied that your

7 Elena V. Fell and Natalia A. Lukianova / Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 215 ( 2015 ) 2 – 8

reasoning skills are in line with the way of thinking expected from a professional educated to the standards of critical reasoning set by the British education system.

Also, acquainting oneself with the concept of lateral thinking is essential for understanding what is expected from an English speaking academic. The most prestigious universities in Britain specifically test candidates for their competence in lateral thinking before accepting them for general University entry (Edward de Bono, 2009).

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by The Tomsk State University Academic D.I. Mendeleev Fund Program in 2015. Prof. Natalia Lukianova took part in this study in 2015.

This study was completed as part of the research project “Youth’s Portrait” of the Future: Methodology of Investigating Representations” funded by the Russian Humanitarian Scientific Fund. Grant Number 15-03-00812a. Prof. Natalia Lukianova and Dr Elena Fell took part in this study.

References

Elder, L. (2002). The Teacher’s Manual for the Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking for Children. Foundation for Critical Thinking. Dillon Beach, CA.

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Heath. Glaser, E.M. (1941). An Experiment in the Development of Critical Thinking. Teachers College, Columbia University. Scheffler, I. (1973). Reason and Teaching. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company. Siegel, H. (1990). Educating Reason. London: Routledge. Shaheen, N. (2012). International Students at UK Universities: Critical Thinking-Related Challenges to Academic Writing Nisbah

Shaheen. Doctoral thesis, University of Huddersfield. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. (Electronic version). URL: http://assessment.trinity.duke.edu/documents/Delphi_Report.pdf./Accessed on 06/05/2015. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction URL: http://www.ocr.org.uk/qualifications/as-a-level-gce-critical-thinking-h052-h452/Accessed on 17/05/2015.

Elder, L. (2009). I think critically, therefore I am. (Electronic version). URL: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/407700.article/Accessed on 15/06/2015.

Swatridge, C. (2014). The Oxford Guide to Effective Argument and Critical Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lipman, M. (1995). Thinking in education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Halpern, D.F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive

monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449-455. Tsui, L. (2006). Cultivating critical thinking: Insights from an elite liberal arts college. The Journal of General Education, 55(2), 200-227. Immigration statistics. (Electronic version). URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/immigration-statistics-october-to-december-

2014/immigration-statistics-october-to-december-2014#study-1/Accessed on 02. 04. 2015. Centre for Teaching and Learning. (Electronic version). URL:

http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/ldc/development/pga/introtandl/resources/2a_deep_surfacestrategic_approaches_to_learning.pdf/ Accessed on 08/06/2015.

Davies, W.M., (2003). A cautionary note about the teaching of critical reasoning: Higher education research and development society of Australia (HERDSA), Learning for an Unknown Future. 2-9th July, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Egege, S. & Kutieleh, S. (2004). Critical thinking: Teaching foreign notions to foreign students, International Education Journal, 4 (4), 75-85. Howard, R.M (2000). Sexuality, textuality: the cultural work of plagiarism. College English, 62, 473–492. Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and Organisations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill. Hofstede’s Intercultural Dimensions. (Electronic version). URL: http://www.kwintessential.co.uk/intercultural/dimensions.html/ Accessed on

13/07/2015. Durkin, K. (2008). The middle way: East Asian master’s students’ perceptions of critical argumentation in U.K. universities. Journal of Studies in

International Education, 12(1), 38-55. Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 301-320. Meyers, C. (1986). Teaching students to think critically. A guide for faculty in all disciplines. San Francisco: Jossy-Bass Publishers. Richmonds, E.D.R. (2007). Bringing critical thinking to the education of developing country professionals. International education journal. 8(1),

1-29. Somwung, P., Siridej, S. (2000). Civics and values of education in Thailand: Documentary analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. 20(1), 82-

92.

8 Elena V. Fell and Natalia A. Lukianova / Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 215 ( 2015 ) 2 – 8

Volet, S.E., Renshaw, P.D., eds. (1996) Chinese students at an Australian university: Adaptability and continuity. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.

Donna B.B., Trosclair E., Zhou Y., Wei M., student and teacher perceptions of academic English writing in Russia, The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, Vol. 2, No 2, 2014, pp. 203-227

Interview of Igor Fedyukin, Deputy Minister of Education and Science of the RF. “Many Russian dissertations do not stand up to scrutiny” (in Russian), Snob.ru, 22 January (2013), accessed 8 August 2014, URL:http://www.snob.ru/selected/entry/56786 accessed on 08/08/2015.

Partch, H. (1974), Genesis Of A Music: An Account Of A Creative Work, Its Roots, And Its Fulfillments, New York: Da Capo Press, pp. 28-29. Lukianova, N. Fell, E. (2015). Internet of things as a symbolic resource of power / Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences pp. 521-525.

doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.565 Tank, J., Prinzing, M. (2014). Remnant “Family”: the role of women in the media discourse on families. ESSACHESS. Journal for

Communication Studies, vol. 7, no. 2(14) / 2014: 95-117.doi: 10.1080/09540253.2014.970614 Fell, E. Duration, Temporality, Self: Prospects for the Future of Bergsonism. Peter Lang, Oxford, 2012. p. 71 Edward de Bono (2009) Lateral Thinking: A Textbook of Creativity. London: Penguin books. Defining Critical Thinking, URL: http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/766 accessed on 06/09/2015. Verbal reasoning tests, URL: http://www.practiceaptitudetests.com/verbal-reasoning-tests/ accessed on 06/09/2015.