Week 1 – Assignment

1

Running head: Title

TITLE 4

Week 1 – Assignment

Informed Con

Below are four examples (see attached documents) of commonly used informed consent forms.

· Anesthesia Preview the document

· Blood transfusion Preview the document

· Special procedure Preview the document

· Surgery Preview the document

· Review one of them and identify the five requirements within that consent form; explain where and how each element is noted within the actual form itself.

· Then, analyze the purpose for such consent forms from both the patient’s and organization’s viewpoints.

Your paper should be two to three pages in length, excluding the title and reference pages; include at least two scholarly sources, in addition to the text; and be written in APA format.

HCA322.W1A1.03.2015

Description:

Total Possible Score: 8.00

Identified the Five Requirements Within One of the Consent Forms

Total: 2.00

Distinguished – Correctly identifies the five requirements within one of the consent forms.

Proficient – Identifies at least four of the requirements within one of the consent forms. Minor details may be missing or inaccurate.

Basic – Identifies four of the requirements within one of the consent forms. Relevant details may be missing or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Identifies fewer than three of the requirements within one of the consent forms; however, significant details are missing and/or inaccurate

Non-Performance – The identification of the five requirements within one of the consent forms is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Explains How Each Element Is Noted Within the Form Itself

Total: 2.00

Distinguished – Thoroughly and accurately explains how each element is noted within the form itself.

Proficient – Explains how at least four elements are noted within the form itself. Minor details are missing or inaccurate.

Basic – Partially explains how at least three elements are noted within the form itself. Relevant details are missing or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Attempts to explain how the elements are noted within the form itself; however does not address each element and/or significant details are missing or inaccurate.

Non-Performance -The explanation of how each element is noted within the form itself is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Analyzes the Purpose for Consent Forms From Both a Patient’s and Organization’s Viewpoint

Total: 2.00

Distinguished – Comprehensively analyzes the purpose for consent forms from both a patient’s and organization’s viewpoints.

Proficient – Analyzes the purpose for consent forms from both a patient’s and organization’s viewpoints. Minor details are missing.

Basic – Partially analyzes the purpose for consent forms from both a patient’s and organization’s viewpoints. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations – Attempts to analyze the purpose for consent forms; however, does not provide both viewpoints and/or significant details are missing.

Non-Performance – The analysis of the purpose for consent forms from both a patient’s and organization’s viewpoints is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Critical Thinking – Explanation of Issues

Total: 0.50

Distinguished -Clearly and comprehensively explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.

Proficient -Clearly explains in detail the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.

Basic – Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.

Below Expectations -Briefly recognizes the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Critical Thinking – Evidence

Total: 0.50

Distinguished – Employs persuasive information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.

Proficient -Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysis of the topic.

Basic – Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic.

Below Expectations -Displays information from external sources, but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.25

Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.

Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic -Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

APA Formatting

Total: 0.25

Distinguished -Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.

Basic – Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.

Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Page Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished -The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Basic -The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Resource Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient – Uses required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic -Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations -Uses inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.